Open in the Archives
Quality whether you want it or not
Be great or be gone
Monday, August 24, 2026 · Page 6 of 12
← Viewpoint

Not Your Parent's Democrat Party"


By Michael Cohen — via Substack

If politics had a pressure gauge, primary season would be the moment it stops measuring anything useful and just starts vibrating in place.

What’s happening inside the Democratic Party right now isn’t one story. It’s several, unfolding simultaneously in different states, under different conditions, all feeding into the same uncomfortable realization: there is no shared agreement on what “winning” is supposed to look like anymore.

Colorado is just the latest flare in the sky.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Melat Kiros defeating longtime Rep. Diana DeGette in a primary would normally be filed away as an upset, maybe even a curiosity. Instead, it lands like part of a pattern that’s getting harder to ignore.

Because Colorado is not operating in isolation.

In New York, multiple self-described democratic socialists have already taken primary victories, including high-profile wins that extended into citywide power. Whatever label you want to use for that trend, it’s not fringe anymore. It’s inside the machinery. It’s winning elections. It’s shaping slates.

Kiros’ victory fits neatly into that same current. Her speech didn’t frame the win as a routine replacement of an incumbent. It was framed as continuation; of a movement, of a correction, of something bigger than a single district. The policy direction is familiar by now: Medicare for All, aggressive action against corporate power, abolition of ICE, and a foreign policy posture that treats Gaza and Palestine not as marginal issues but as central moral tests.

Supporters hear urgency in that.

Critics hear risk.

And both reactions are now living inside the same party structure, competing for the same ballot lines.

That tension is not theoretical. It’s procedural.

Primaries reward intensity. They reward voters who are already activated, already aligned, already plugged in. General elections do the opposite. They punish narrowness. They force expansion into voters who don’t follow factional debates and don’t care who endorsed whom.

Right now, Democrats are choosing nominees through one system while preparing those nominees to survive the other.

That’s the core problem.

Colorado makes the point more complicated, not simpler. Alongside Kiros’ victory, John Hickenlooper survives a challenge from the left. Manny Rutinel wins his own race with a more progressive economic pitch. Same state. Different outcomes. No single ideological wave, just localized decisions stacking up into something that looks like momentum depending on where you stand.

That’s what makes this hard to read in real time.

Primary politics gets treated like national consensus when it isn’t. It’s a patchwork of local electorates making local decisions under a shared party banner. Sometimes those decisions rhyme. Sometimes they don’t.

But repetition starts to matter.

Across states, candidates explicitly running against establishment Democrats are not just participating anymore. They are winning. And they are winning often enough that it can no longer be dismissed as noise.

That doesn’t settle the argument inside the party. It sharpens it.

Because the unresolved question is not whether the progressive wing exists. It clearly does. The question is what happens when that wing’s candidates step out of primaries and into general elections where persuasion matters more than passion, and where the audience is broader, quieter, and far less interested in internal party language.

Republicans, meanwhile, don’t need to solve any of this. They only need to observe it. Internal division in an opposing party is not a problem to fix; it’s an opportunity to frame.

But even that is secondary to what Democrats are actually confronting.

Underneath the messaging and the policy fights is a more basic question: is this a temporary burst of ideological competition inside a stable party, or the beginning of a longer structural shift in what the party is?

There is no clean answer yet.

What is clear is that the old assumption—that incumbency plus party label equals safety, doesn’t hold the way it used to. And what replaces it hasn’t stabilized.

So the party moves in two directions at once. It produces nominees through an increasingly energized ideological base, then asks those nominees to survive an electorate that is not built the same way.

That may work.

But it is not calm.

And in politics, instability rarely announces itself directly. It shows up later, usually in results that no one inside the system claims they saw coming.

____________________________________________________________________________

MORE THAN 500,000 PEOPLE READ MY ARTICLES THIS WEEK ALONE.

SO, WHERE ARE YOU?

I AM ASKING EACH OF YOU TO RESTACK, LIKE AND SHARE.

IT’S REALLY THAT EASY.

HELP US TO REBUILD AND GROW OUR COMMUNITY!

AND IF YOU CAN, PLEASE CONSIDER SUPPORTING THIS PLATFORM BY BECOMING A PAID SUBSCRIBER.

Yeah, I know; you’re tired. This shit is exhausting.

Guess what? Me too.

But I’ve spent the last 8 years throwing punches in the dark so truth could get a little daylight. And now I’m asking you to step into the ring with me.

Because if you’re still reading this, you already get it:

This isn’t just a newsletter. It’s a rally cry. A war drum. A line in the sand.

We are not passive observers of the downfall. We are the resistance. We call out the liars. We drag corruption by the collar into the sunlight. We say the quiet parts out loud; and we don’t flinch.

But here’s the truth: I can’t do this solo. Not anymore.

The storm is already here. We are standing in it. And it’s wearing stars and stripes like camouflage, preaching “freedom” while it sells fascism at retail.

So let me ask you:

Are. You. In?

Because this is not a scroll-and-forget read. This is a living, breathing, fire-breathing movement; and movements don’t move unless you do.

We need to be louder than spin, tougher than propaganda, and impossible to gaslight.

That takes more than clicks. More than likes.

It takes skin in the game.

So if you believe truth matters; if you’re sick of the bullshit, if you’re ready to stop screaming into the algorithm and start pushing back with purpose, this is your next step.

HERE’S HOW YOU PUT YOUR FOOT ON THE GAS:

Become a paid subscriber. Fund fearless, unfiltered journalism that hits back.

Share this with the loudest people you know; the ones who never sit down and shut up.

Build the community. Amplify the message. Be the damn megaphone.

And yeah; Founding Members? The first 240 of you will get a signed, numbered, limited-edition Substack version of Revenge. That’s not just a collector’s item. That’s receipts. Proof you didn’t sit this one out.

But let’s be clear:

This isn’t about a book.

It’s about backbone.

It’s about calling out the gaslighters and refusing to be played.

It’s about locking arms and saying, “Not. On. Our. Watch.”

You want to make a difference?

Then make it; right now.

Because if we don’t fight for truth, no one will.

But if we fight together?

They can’t drown us out.

Let’s be so loud, they wish we were just angry tweets.

Let’s be unshakable.

Unignorable.

Un-fucking-breakable.

Let’s go!

Share